Menu
» Rail Law Blog
U.S. Supreme Court eliminates need to prove retaliatory intent in FRSA cases
February 8th, 2024
The United States Supreme Court held in Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, Case No. 22-660, that a whistleblower bringing a claim under a statute with the same legal standard as the Federal Rail Safety Act (FRSA) does not need to prove that the employer…
Read More
Read More
Categories: Rail Law Blog
FELA Claim for Deceased Railroad Employee
December 2nd, 2021
Contributor: Andrew J. Thompson
The Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 USC §51 et seq., is a federal law that provides damages to railroad employees injured because of a railroad’s negligence during their employment. What happens to a claim under…
Read More
Read More
Categories: Rail Law Blog
Ziparo v. CSXT - 2nd Circuit Expands Scope of Protection Under FRSA
October 23rd, 2021
Contributor: Andrew J. Thompson
Cody Ziparo worked as a Conductor for CSX Transportation, Inc. in Watertown, New York. CSXT utilized an “On-Board Work Order System” (OBWO) at this location, which requires the train crew to record tasks into a tablet computer as they are…
Read More
Read More
FRSA Causation Standard - Another Federal Circuit Rejects "Inextricably Intertwined"
May 28th, 2021
As I have previously discussed in the Rail Law Blog, the most disputed issue in proving a claim under the Federal Rail Safety Act (“FRSA”) is often whether an employee’s protected activity is a contributing factor in the railroad…
Read More
Read More
Lost Wages Payable in FELA Claim Are Taxable Under RRTA
March 17th, 2019
On March 4, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided BNSF Railway Co. v. Loos and held that damages paid for an on-the-job injury are taxable under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA). Previously, FELA awards were considered payment for an in…
Read More
Read More
Categories: Rail Law Blog
FRSA Update - "Contributing Factor" Element
February 18th, 2019
To prove a claim of retaliation under the Federal Rail Safety Act (“FRSA”), a railroad worker must prove the following elements: (1) he engaged in a protected activity; (2) the railroad knew about the protected activity; (3) the worker wa…
Read More
Read More
Categories: Rail Law Blog
Witnesses and the FELA Claim
January 18th, 2018
When a railroad employee is injured at work, there are frequently other employees around who can testify as to the cause of the accident. It is important that the injured employee, or his union representative, gather the names of such witnesses. It s…
Read More
Read More
Categories: Rail Law Blog
FRSA Medical Treatment Provision Cases Part II
January 2nd, 2018
In my previous post, I discussed Section (c) of the FRSA, which prohibits railroads from interfering with the medical treatment plan of an employee. Since that blog was posted, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled the decision of the Administ…
Read More
Read More
Update: FRSA Medical Treatment Provision Cases
March 17th, 2017
In a previous post, I discussed the medical treatment provisions of the Federal Rail Safety Act (FRSA) that prohibit railroads from denying, delaying, or interfering with the medical treatment of an employee “who is injured during the course of…
Read More
Read More
Can the Railroad Discriminate Based on Obesity?
March 16th, 2017
This post considers the question of whether an employer can take an adverse action against an employee because that person is obese, or overweight. The issue was recently presented to me when a railroad signal employee was removed from his assignment…
Read More
Read More
Categories: Rail Law Blog